SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 175.25+0.6%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kech who wrote (24219)6/27/2002 11:27:25 AM
From: foundation  Read Replies (1) of 197001
 
re; quote from the Sprint CTO

==========

Valente must massage analyst perceptions of Sprint's future.

The best thing about dv for cash strapped PCS is that it places upgrade CAPEX out into the still undefined future.

A few facts:

1) If PCS hasn't confirmed a market for data before dv is commercial (perhaps 05) they'll have failed as an entity well before.

2) If PCS confirms a market for data, dedicating timeslots to do will make perfect sense, especially with the flexibility afforded by dynamic allocation between 1x and do to meet changing voice/data capacity needs through the day. This is one of the features that makes do GREAT.

3) If PCS confirms a market for data, the business case will demand the economies of do over dv - even if they choose to wait for dv viability.

4) dv will be profoundly more complex and expensive than do - with little or no additional performance and ZERO increase in capacity.

Consistant with IJ's recent comments, it's possible that there may never be a business case for dv - especially now with GSM1x for possible GSM converts. Previously, dv would have been the choice for a renegade Euro carrier, offering GSM Map and 5mhz compatibility. Not any more. Now, I can't think of any purpose for dv.

As always, it's a funny world.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext