SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 106.70-0.3%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (87470)6/27/2002 1:11:08 PM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (2) of 116796
 
<increased CEF demand supports CEF premium to NAV>

Likewise, increased CEF supply should reduce premium to NAV

They will take almost all of the proceeds from the share offering and put into into gold and silver at a lower premium to spot (3%) than the CEF premium to NAV (12%). This effectively means they think buying gold and silver directly is a better deal than buying CEF shares !

When CEF was at a big discount, it made sense to buyback shares, and at a premium it makes sense to offer more shares. It just seems to me that when CEF is buying shares (at a discount) I would be also be a buyer and when CEF is selling shares (at a premium) I'd rather be a seller, too !
Historically, most closed end funds do not maintain premiums.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext