Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (3597)	6/28/2002 2:58:38 AM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) of 11633

I posed a simple question for you, based on your stated strategy. I get, as usual, 30 lines of pontification and blathergab. Do you realize that you have established yourself as a complete laughingstock? I'm almost embarrassed for you. Almost, but not enough to leave you alone, because in addition to being a fool, you're also an arrogant pompous jerk. -------- Lets see I deliver a testable verifiable method that any one can test with the past trust data. WHERE IS YOUR TESTABLE AND VERIFIABLE METHOD SO THAT OTHERS MAY TEST IT?????????????? ITS NO WHERE TO BE SEEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You want to try to discredit that method of mine then by all means provide the real trust past trading data to do that. YOU WON'T OR CAN'T. I'll put that challenge to any and all. You see I have near 20 years of trading data for 3 trusts to counter anything that anyone can present. I delivered some of that data already in past posts for the trusts ERF,PGF. Go ahead provide counters to that if you can. Other data was presented for the likes of PWI in which case it showed real time that buying more units under $6 was absolutely the right thing to do. You can't counter any of that. BUT GO AHEAD AND TRY I DARE YOU. For each one flimsy example you bring I can bring forward not one, not two but three or more. In the same manner I was able to discredit your claim that switching worked most everytime with every trust. You produced 1, I produced 4 (from your own list) giving you a 20% success rate and a 80% failure rate. THATS WHAT THE REAL WORLD DATA SHOWS. As to who is the FOOL HERE. I guess that would be the one that would have to change his story (LIE) of what he bought after selling PWI just to try to win. Again thanks for showing that all too clearly and thanks also for ignoring the repeated calls to explain why you did it. That more than anything proves the con artist that you are. ------------ I'll repeat your strategy for you: "If you own a stock that has declined in price and have more money to invest, you are ALWAYS better off buying more of the stock you own than buying another stock." Right or wrong? Thousands of Nortel and JDSU investors await your answer. -------- Even such a con artist like yourself should stick to what it is we have been discussing ITS TRUSTS NOT STOCKS. Trying to compare apples to oranges. THAT WON'T WORK. No one is going to fall for that feeble attempt. Further please show how nortel or jdsu has paid out high current income each and every month since its been around. As for a trust example using that real world data you hate so much PGF has paid out more than $22 in distributions thus far each and every month each and every year, and its unit price is around $15. Again please show that any stock has done that in that same period. I LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR TRADEMARK ""NO REPLY"" WHEN IT COMES TO THE REAL FACTS. And all can take from that who is right. ---------------- Mind you, according to your theory, they haven't really lost any money so long as they don't sell their stock. Unrealized loses don't count, right Peter? ------ Again according to Revenue Canada that is correct. Now please come back with some real fact and data showing how Revenue Canada is wrong in the matter and you are right?????? We all await anxiously. ------------ ------ So here we have it another posting from you. And in it are no real trust facts or data. No real trust issues or concerns. Only name calling and insults. But then what can one expect from someone who has to lie and change his story just so he can be right.-----------

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next