SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Senior who wrote (14710)6/28/2002 2:22:09 PM
From: Grommit  Read Replies (2) of 78742
 
Paul, thanks but that's not the point. I'd prefer if you commented on what I what I purchased. Tell me how you think they're great picks; you will buy some too and we will both make a lot of money.

Or, failing that, tell me something I've overlooked and get me to sell the damn stock. :o)

Bob's comment:
--- Insider activity is no assurance [WCOM's Sullivan sold no shares, GHV's CB bought heavily a few months before BK became obvious]...but I'm going to start requiring that it at least not be going against me. ---

I couldn't agree more. It's hard to find companies who pass the hurdle of "some insider buying", but a lower hurdle of "at least not a ridiculous amount of selling", is prudent, IMHO. In the cases where I bought along with the insiders, the worst case is ususally not too bad -- ususally, at the worst, it's no gain and dead money for awhile. But after awhile, all bets are off. As the insider buys age, their forecasting ability wears off.

exception - CHP quote.yahoo.com Here's one where the insiders continue to buy, while the stock is freshly dropping. So there are no assurances.

grommit
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext