SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: PartyTime who wrote (3377)6/28/2002 2:53:13 PM
From: mmmary  Read Replies (1) of 12465
 
I would think tony would agree to those assurances

it makes sense. Of course if he agrees to hand over absolutely everything he has as bond, he has no money to support his family or an attorney. That would be unfair. He should be allowed enough to support his family during the estimated course of the trial and to pay for adequate legal defense otherwise the government would be taking unfair advantage. Not only that but if he is allowed enough to keep what he needs to support his family and attorney, they should be assured that he's not taking that little bit of money and fleeing, especially when you consider the case doesn't seem to be that strong. Tony didn't give the money to the FBI guy. The bit about the CEO was public. You didn't need an FBI contact to get that info. He had no preknowledge of 911 as evidenced by the governments own reports on the issue. No one had preknowledge in the market though there were tons of rumors. We shall see how it turns out.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News