Zeev's Turnips - No Politics Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: augieboo who wrote (88442)	6/29/2002 2:44:31 AM
From: thecalculator	Read Replies (2) of 99280

<<I lost more than $150,000 "investing" (LTBH) based on fundamental analysis.>> Fundamental analysis starts by first looking at the balance sheet. I don't denounce MOMO investing but it's a lot safer with a momo stock that is not in the expensive category (again, I'm not talking cheap). Take AMCC for example at $4, or SNDK <$10. Those are a much safer risk in MOMO trading or long term swing trading than some bloated GNSS at >$20, or QLGC at $38...stocks that were on the list you provided Connie. You had ARTG, why? Because it's bouncy? No more than CORV (well, maybe slightly more). finance.yahoo.com But the huge difference between them is that CORV is a safer play at its current valuation, and that makes a difference to those that might consider and can tolerate holding a stock more than a few hours, which was what her question was with regard to.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next