SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (268242)6/29/2002 11:50:58 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
allen, there is no proving, Mr. Allen originally proffered the acts or the lack of action by the stupidest that ever was would not have dissuaded binnie boob and the boys.
You stated that Cy's assertion, the Clinton administration "got a lot of people killed on September 11 is unsubstantiated and ridiculous accusations

Mr Allen then gave examples of dots and one could connect that support CY's proffer. I continued to give additional examples and exposed what I considered your shallow analysis.

You seemed to object to Mr Allen's dots using a statement of time line.

I expanded upon your missile that missed and the fact that nothing was done after the Cole. Which was most likely one of the key stupid inaction that is of major import.

The reasonable response to the Cole should have led to the extermination of binnie and his boys by covert or whatever means. That's my opinion.

Then I offered ther major events that conveyed a house divided among itself.
As to the Florida election you seem to have forgotten that sore loser had his day in court and made his case as to why there was a counting problem. I listened to the complete testimony of his political scientist on the faults in the punch card voting machine and his testimony was completely discredited by the testimony of the Chief Engineer who was responsible for the design of the punch card machines.

Try to visualize or imagine voting with punch cards and what does it take to do it physically. Then examine what the experts testify at to required force. The one can reduce opinions to something one can measure and view with common sense.

The essence sore loser argument on punch cards boils down to a proffer that there was a problem because tens of thousands of voters went to the polls and were to weak to lift an orange. An 8 ounce orange. The force required to exceed the burst strength of a chad. When I listen to stories I go to the physical rules and create in my mind a model of what's being analyzed. In that I have done this as a Systems Engineer and I'm quite good at it, I test the theory in the real world. Based upon my analysis before the testimony I estimated that 12 onces should be the force required and I've posted that on this thread. So from the beginning is was clear to me that the punch card machine argument was idiotic. That Sore Loser went on the record with it speaks volumes of his stupidity or criminal/unpatriotic mind.

Any honest person who can think and has any understanding of the physical world would conclude the same thing and an outsider would wonder, how did this idiot fool so many people and got so many to vote for him.

The stupidity of the case sore loser presented shows he was to stupid to understand and was surrounded by advisors to stupid to understand or there was wholesale dishonesty.. And this guy go more popular votes and the media widely call PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH dumb at the time.

So to an outsider, what can be stupider than Sore Loser. Well the stupidest that ever was of course.

Also a Yale PHD dude offered statistical evidence about your proffer on margin of error. On cross examination after he was shown he had been provided and incomplete data set and presented an analysis of a complete data set the his testimony and assertions were false.

This obscene set of proffers that were on the record under oath by the sore loser made his bogus contest another factor.

Voting is not rocket science, If one is not competent to follow simple directions one should not be allowed to vote.

Based upon the idiot case presented by sore loser on the record no amount of mindless motor mouthing about talking head analysis makes any sense.

An examination of every recount that found PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH won underlines the fact that you proffer that it could go either way is as dumb as the arguments presented by sore loser on the record.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext