Zeev's Turnips - No Politics Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: augieboo who wrote (88557)	6/29/2002 6:39:57 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (3) of 99280

Augie I disagree. Please reread my statement. I said both sides of Naz committment decreased substantially. Now it is possible for the long side to decrease more thus making the "net affect" more short, but looking again I see that might be wrong as well. cftc.gov Actually I am glad you made me do a double take. This is a monstrous decrease in both long and short contracts on the Naz. I had not looked at drop in minis before. look at both the NQ minis as well as regular contracts. Zeev, any thoughts here? Why the sudden "lack of interest" in the Naz, both directions. The net affect might be more short (someone do the math please, noting the difference between minis and regulars), but the overall drop is what gets me floored. M

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next