SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael M who wrote (16141)6/30/2002 1:23:58 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
Re you being fringe-y, Michael:

Regarding the Pledge decision (which will be overturned anyway), you wrote:

I think this ruling could be the "straw" that got to Joe Camel. Frankly, response may take a back seat to retaliation on this one.

and

I believe many will be insist on saving what we have v. waiting to see what the 9th wants to give us.

In reply to my question, "What's that, MM? A hint of a vigilante action, perhaps? Or what? A petition, maybe?"

your reply was not to say I had misunderstood regarding you and perhaps some hint vigilantism in your retaliation-comments, but to write "IMO, some members of the 9th Circuit fit the definition of vigilante like a glove,"

To which Laz replies, "Evasion. What did you mean by "retaliation"?"

A question you declined to answer. Perhaps you didn't see it, though.

The above is why I consider the adjective "extremist" to be appropriate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News