PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: PROLIFE who wrote (268634)	6/30/2002 7:17:24 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (3) of 769670

The father felt that the inclusion of 'under God' in a pledge recited by nearly all students was an influence on his child that violated the Constitutional separation of Church and State. Whether she participated or not is not the issue; it is the exposure, especially to such a young child, that is the violation. What if the pledge said, instead of 'under God', the opposite? If it said 'under no God'? You would be screaming bloody murder, and I would be agreeing with you. Because the point is that the Federal government must take NO POSITION as far as religion, either positive or negative. Get it? It is not an issue of God/no God, but a government that is completely neutral on the issue.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next