Ray,
Prego.
Qui bono? I always hope it's Io. Cui bono? I always hope it's per me.
I don't really want to do any Enron politics on this thread (this may come as a surprise) but I thought Enron was a somewhat equal opportunity contributor. As a matter of absolute fact, this thread could run 500 posts a day (you could do 85 of them, easily, and not even be out of breath) on Enron, Worldcom, Bush, Saddam, Terry McAuliffe, Bill Clinton's pardons, Arthur Leavitt's SEC tenure, Harvey Pitt's career yada yada yada and be on the top of the Hot Subjects List for a long time. Would that be a good thing?
This may make me a bad person but I don't care. Tell you what, if, during the course of today at least 5 regulars show up on the thread and say, by golly this is really important and they want to discuss Enron, Bush and your other topics, then fine, we'll let it go for a little while. If not, we'll just drop it as per earlier posts?
Remember, this is a moderated thread, right?
Kb |
