SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (147946)7/3/2002 2:35:19 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (3) of 1576880
 
Ted, <AMD has lost share to an INTC who is slashing chip prices at a considerable cost to its ASPs.>

Why did AMD lose market share? Think about this one. Had they stuck to their optimistic plans with Thoroughbred, Barton, SOI, and Hammer, they wouldn't be losing as much share. Meanwhile, Intel is pulling forward new speed grade releases of Northwood.

The market is shrinking, for sure, but AMD would have surely survived a price war with Intel had they executed to their original plan. This is what Sanders loved to brag about, that AMD was somehow immune to Intel's pricing strategies because AMD had "the better product" and better execution.

Despite the cover excuses that AMD management will give, the 33% drop is not entirely attributable to the weak market and the pricing pressure from Intel. It is also the result of poor execution. More likely the result of asking the impossible from engineers who are only human.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext