Strictly: Drilling II Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: scotty who wrote (15170)	7/5/2002 3:14:59 PM
From: SliderOnTheBlack	Read Replies (2) of 36161

Hmmmmmm ? re: Physical $ILVER ~ re: scotty's silver link ["wildly bullish silver developments....click on Ted Butler archives....top article.... investmentrarities.com "] For those that have made a nice return on this Gold/Silver move... it wouldn't be a bad idea - to take a % of one's total profits here and place them in some "zero cost basis" physical...held for the longterm, or any unforseen armageddeonesque parabolic move. I do like Physical Silver here... Interesting article by Ted Butler on the Central Funds of Canada's SILVER buy and resulting COMEX inventory activity... Buffet didn't make that massive SILVER buy due to any bunker mentality...as he didn't dump all of his Coca-Cola, Gillette, or McDonalds Stock and go all to T-Bills... it was a SILVER specific - play on physical....a play on what Ted Butler may correctly be calling the largest (and most irrational) short position in the history of commodities. ...the man is no fool. I think we'll see a move from $5 to $7 even if they keep the cap on COMEX... not a bad return and those 90% Silver Bags be lookin' veeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrry interesting here...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next