SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : World Affairs Discussion
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (62)7/6/2002 7:57:05 AM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (1) of 3959
 
Yes Nadine, the piece is something that is a combination of both. That is they are hard on the ISraelis as well as they are calling on Arafat to go also. What the Saudis did in the past is no longer relevant now. For them things have changed because of the threat that they face from one of their own, Bin Laden.

After seeing what Bin Laden could do to the US, they have no doubt that Al Qaeda could easily cause havoc to the Saudi monarchy. And hence they are forced to change their tune, such as recognizing the existence of Israel etc. Even though their sponsorship of the peace plan calls for Israel's withdrawl to the 1972 boundaries, it would be interesting to see if they would settle for Israel to move to the 2000 boundary. I am optimistic. I am not so sure about you.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News