Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 259.65

+2.3%

Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joe NYC who wrote (84382)	7/8/2002 1:58:11 AM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) of 275872

I was talking 2400, thinking Tbred and Barton, but the same applies to Hammer and Barton. If there are 2 processors that will share the same ratings, say 2800, they should have roughly the same average performance on a group of benchmarks. But this is the problem. AMD has claimed 3400+ for Hammer but what does that mean? What do you think it means? The only definition for QuantiHurtz is that it is relative to Palomino (or is it Tbird?). AMD won't say if that still applies to Hammer. Do you think a 3400+ Palomino will compete with a 3GHz+ NorthWood with 533MHz FSB? If so, what makes you think it will when we know Palomino doesn't scale well? Does 3400+ QuantiHurtz mean something else? What would make anyone think so when AMD refuses to say? EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next