Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jcky who wrote (34106)	7/10/2002 6:19:22 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Doesn't a major invasion and commitment of troops in Iraq leave us soft in the underbelly for an al Qaida counterstrike? With what? Horses, sabers, RPGs? It's the AQ terrorism that we should be concerned about, not its conventional military menace. The US can (and has) made mincemeat out of AQ in any conventional military sense. No need to worry about that point, IMO. Is the invasion of Iraq fiscally responsible for Americans? Depends on how costly it would be to suffer the results of a few small nuclear explosions and a few instances of bioterrorism. The more one contemplates about the invasion of Iraq, the less feasible it becomes. You really think so? Why?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next