Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (148021)	7/10/2002 11:33:07 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) of 1573074

Unless he is totally innocent of wrongdoing in the Harken mess, its a little like asking the fox to clean out the hen house. Let's look at this logically. What kind of "wrongdoing" could he have conceivably have been guilty of? It has been previously investigated (at least 3 times) as to whether he was working on inside information, and he has been shown to be free of wrongdoing. As to the late filing of the form, it is important to keep in mind that THAT would be criminal only if there was intent to defraud -- however, the fact the he filed the original return indicating his planned liquidation is proof positive there was no intent to defraud. Bottom line: What kind of wrongdoing could Bush conceivably be guilty of in this matter? How many times does it need to be investigated? Is three or more not enough? This is clearly an attempt on the part of the Democrats to smear Bush, just like was done with the racist ad in Texas during the campaign. And it pleases me to see it backfiring on the scoundrels who are doing it (Carville & Associates).

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next