SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BigBull who wrote (34205)7/12/2002 4:54:29 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Despite stringent denials by the Jordanian authorities that US forces will be permitted to use their territory for future operations against Baghdad, Western diplomats have told The Times that King Abdullah has consented to a limited US presence involved in defensive and humanitarian operations.

“Jordan wants to remain firmly on the fence in any conflict between America and Iraq,” one diplomat said. “But that is looking increasingly difficult. It has agreed to allow a US-manned radar station and American search and rescue teams to operate out of the country to pick up US pilots.”

The Pentagon has reportedly planned a three-pronged attack on Iraq from Turkey in the north, Kuwait in the south and Jordan in the west.

So we have the Jordanians talking about a "limited US presence involved in defensive and humanitarian operations" and the Americans talking about a three-pronged attack with one prong attacking through Jordan. Doesn't this seem like they are talking about two fairly different things?

I hope for the sake of Jordan that Saddam doesn't succeed in provoking the Israelis into joining the fight. Given the size of Jordan's Palestinian population, that would make King Abdullah's position somewhat difficult, and provide the American intervention with an additional problem at a preoccupied time.

Odd, also, to find out that the SAS is planning to sneak into Iraq and blow up Saddam's WMD sites. If we can do this during a war, maybe we should consider doing it beforehand. Better still if raids could snatch some people and records. It would be rather nice to have some real evidence of Saddam's WMD capability before deciding that a war is necessary.

The more I hear about this, the more question marks appear....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News