SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : S&P Midcap 400 Portfolio (^MID, MDY)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Londo who started this subject7/13/2002 1:16:55 AM
From: Londo   of 181
 
Subtle change to the title post:

A $1000 investment in the S&P 400 index from January 1992 to January 2001 would have yielded $3525, or 15.0% compounded annually. The same investment in the S&P 500 index would have yielded $3165, or 13.7% compounded annually.

A $1000 investment in the S&P 400 index from January 1992 to January 2002 would have yielded $3468, or 13.2% compounded annually. The same investment in the S&P 500 index would have yielded $2752, or 10.7% compounded annually.

Compare 13.7% and 10.7% for the S&P 500 between 2000 and 2001. Incredible.

The fact that you could have turned a flat performance (1% down) compared to the S&P 500 or Nasdaq 100 for the year 2001 is interesting. The S&P 400 got hammered pretty badly in the year 2002 so far, but the S&P 500 got hammered even worse. And we all know about the Nasdaq.

I still think this index is the best one to invest in, providing that somebody held a gun up to your head and forced you to index invest. I still believe that the concept gets diluted if too many people do it (which is obviously why the S&P 500 is not going to yield anything more than 10% a year for the next 10 years.. too much money into it!)

One derivation of this is that anybody investing in companies shouldn't invest in S&P 500 components.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext