"since Duncan and a few others"
If you think that the dot com bomb and and the crash of the market can be blamed on "Duncan and a few others" then you have no idea of what I am talking about.
I am NOT tarring ANYONE, but if John the Baptist was offered Billions for stating an opinion and he knew no one could ever question it, HE MIGHT TAKE A LITTLE LESS TIME THAN HE WOULD OTHER WISE, NOT DECLARING A 12 Billion dollar loan, or trying to determine what was an expense, or maybe taking the time to pray for a little guidance, say in aol's case, not expensing those free discs,
And if you dont know how CPA firms work then I will tell you that there were thousands of people involved both at AA and other firms,
And if you think a CPA would do this unless his congressman assured him that he would not be caught,
then you are a Dupee, not a Dupor.
And if you think I would waste my time if it were "Duncan and a few" were the only ones involved....,
THIS IS NOT AN ETHICS ISSUE, this is a motivation issue, this is an issue which causes people to describe IN ENGLISH what is happening with a company.
This is a law issue. If you want ethics, buy stock in a divinity school!!!
:)))
The term "scapegoat" was invented in Early England. A goat was loaded with symbols of all the wrongs for that years harvest, then they old Saxons drowned the goat so that the town could continue.
The early Englanders did this because they were dumb enough to think this would solve the problem.
I made those last two paragraphs up, but you get the point. |
