SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: paul_philp who wrote (52097)7/15/2002 2:34:45 AM
From: hueyone  Read Replies (1) of 54805
 
I would love to see a more detailed breakdown and exactly the options difference. I will go back and read how S&P calculates option costs.

In the case of Siebel I noticed that the Core Earnings number in the Barrons article is exactly equal to the pro forma reported earnings number giving effect to SFAS No. 123 that is reported in the notes to the financial statements on page 50 in the SEBL 10K. Therefore, I would venture to say that it appears very likely that S&P is using the Black Scholes estimates (SFAS 123) for options expense that companies provide in their notes to the 10ks.

Best, Huey
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext