SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JBTFD who wrote (274941)7/15/2002 10:38:31 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
Mark Anderson, your bias or your stupidity continues to shine forth. I've taken none of your words out of
context and I've provided links back to the messages that are one or twos lines so that anyone can
verify easily exactly what I have said about what you have said. Any assertion that I have taken your
words selectively is raw stupidity of pure dishonesty. Your stupid one liners stand out like neon signs.

Pointing our bias and dishonest thinking is not an attack. It's Pointing our bias and dishonest thinking.
You take my posts as attacks and then conclude I'm disingenuous. I conclude that that is just whining
and sniveling. I take you at and quote your words. Mark Anderson who has expressed the sentiment
that he does not care what other say just puts his biased interpretation on my words and does not take
them at face value.

So as I said You are welcome to post here as often as you like. It is good to have someone with such
demonstrated narrow minded thinking, presenting the narrow minded thinking point of view. Bias, hate,
smear, vulgarity, what does the narrow minded thinking point of view think is it's enemy. The more you
post the more all will know.

So to my the key words of bias and stupidity, unAmerican judgemental garbage of Mark Anderson are.

#reply-17735948 I said I didn't like the Bush family, I don't respect that some of their money came from
war, ie Carlyle, and to me they represent the attitude of being beholden to corporate America in a way I
don't trust.

Those words defend #reply-17724997 I'll be honest. I dont like the whole family.

The above is bias and bigotry, ignorance of the first order. An attitude clueless of American
Sacred Honor.

Mark Andersons law 1, if someone I don't like works for some company I feel is ???unworthy, then Mark
Anderson has the right to conclude and publicly publish the fact that that individual is dishonest and not
to be trusted. In fact the whole family is not to be trusted as the whole family is dishonest. Why else
would Mark Anderson say he dislikes the WHOLE family.

Mark Andersons law 2, Any individual or individuals who concludes or suggest or present information
defending someone who Mark Anderson has judged to be in violation of Mark Andersons law 1 is to
ignored, insulted and judged to be dishonest.

The typical Mark Anderson perception and method of judgement.
From: Mark Anderson #reply-17724980
"I dont give a shit what the SEC thinks or does"

Mark Anderson is just to stupid to get that saying those who were informed and made an informed
decision are wrong because he feels they are wrong and thus he is justified in slandering PRESIDENT
GEORGE W. BUSH is wrong.

Mark Anderson is just to stupid to get that slandering and smear attacking PRESIDENT GEORGE W.
BUSH based upon his ignorant feelings are wrong and unAmerican.

My analysis thus far....
You go down the posting path so predictable.....

#reply-17735333
Once again Mark Anderson asserts that I've changed the rules and
Mark Anderson also says that I've attempted to deny Mark Anderson the right to post slander, vulgarity,
lies and insults or anything.

I have not changed any rules.
have just used Mark Anderson's posts to illustrate what is unAmerican thinking and I have explained
my rationale as to why I call Mark Anderson's thinking unAmerican.

So to refute Mark Anderson's assertions, I simply quote Mark Anderson .

I have seen Mark Anderson name calling and slandering from his very first posts.

#reply-17724769
#reply-17724852 Hey, if daddy Bush's appointees decide not to pursue it, that's their choice. I dont have
to take at face value their BS reasons for it.

Yes anyone who does not like PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH's family can chose to make statements
suggesting all those he dislikes are dishonest and lying. That what BS reasons are, lying.

Just because you are to stupid to see your own immediately resort to name calling and slander, anyone
who is not biased and is honest sees exactly how your do what you say you decry.

So in review of Mark Anderson, self admitted poster child of unAmerican name calling and slander....

Mark says LOL.... "I guess it is obvious to anyone on the receiving end of their spray that they don't
want us around."

Actually Mark Anderson's directly quotable one liners that show so perfectly unAmerican vacant liberal
minded lefty loonism is richly enjoyed. I love your comic routine of such transparent bias and bigotry of
thought. The emotion sans reason of your words are ROTFLOL material.

Mark, by the way this is America and you have every right to be all the unAmerican vacant liberal
minded lefty loon you can be. LOL

The fact that you are so completely clueless to what you are really saying is hilarious.

You words are so clear and specific that you are my poster child example of the vacant liberal minded
lefty loon smear monger. That is not a complement... LOL

WHY......
What's funny as hell????

LOL #reply-17733388 "Pure partisanism cloaked in self righteous pseudo patriotism."

ROTFLOL..... This is just my simple analysis of Mark Anderson SPEAK...

Well you start with a vulgar insult. LOL Then you proffer you only were making an innocent statement.

From: Mark Anderson
#reply-17733331 "My point about the SEC was that they have simply declined to pursue the case
against Bush. That is not a declaration of no wrong doing."

If you believe that is all you said, you are a fool, an idiot. I make my case just quoting you and what you
have said and I explain why what you have said violates my ideas of what being and American with
Sacred Honor in his heart is.

The typical Mark Anderson perception and method of judgement.
From: Mark Anderson #reply-17724980
"I dont give a shit what the SEC thinks or does"

and because Mark Anderson by his own words
From: Mark Anderson #reply-17724997
"I'll be honest. I dont like the whole family."

Mark Anderson feels free declare...
#reply-17725295 I see no defense of the fraudulent subsidiary purchase.

Only hate can motivate someone to ignore informed opinions and slander the honor of another. To make
an assertive judgement that a fraudulent subsidiary purchase occurred and PRESIDENT GEORGE W.
BUSH was involved.

My mind is closed to the above thinking method of rational that asserts another has no honor. Wether
that is the President and or every member of the SEC. This assertion, because one doesn't like a family,
that anyone or many are dishonest and without honor.

To me the above method of thinking is UnAmerican. It violates the constitutional rights of a fellow
American or many.

I have not guessed that you have made a dishonest statement.
My rules of being an American prevents me from doing that. I have taken you at your word and used
your words to illustrate my definition of a hateful unAmerican mind.

I dislike individuals who have acted in ways that are dishonest. There actions do not affect how I feel
about other members of that individuals family. I find it mind boggling that anyone would transfer dislike in
such a manner. I accept that their are individuals who do think in this very hateful and unAmerican way.

As an American these words of the Declaration sum it up.

"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we
mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

A person who respects his own sacred Honor cannot dislike an entire family or disregard the informed
opinions of others and guess that others are making dishonest statements.

When Mark Anderson who thinks as I have described with his own words calls me close minded to his
way of thinking, I rejoice in the complement.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext