The anonymous nature of the internet is, IMO, more a problem than a benefit.
The example used in the article, for instance, of a parent criticizing a school official. In the pre-internet days, it took some effort to make that criticism to any signifcant number of people without revealing who you were --anonymous letters to the papers were usually not printed, and anonymous letters generally were not favorably looked on. But with the internet, one can spread a rumor, truth, or lie very widely very quickly, with no accountability. I am mystified as to why the ACLU thinks this is a good thing.
The Washington State constitution is, I think, very wise in providing, Article I, Section 5, "Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right." A nice blend of right and responsibility. The internet, IMO, overemphasizes the right and underemphasizes the responsibility. |
