CNBC, the Not So Happy Hooker -ggg- The author is quite serious though...
-----------------------------------------------------------
AEGEAN CAPITAL GROUP INC.
STOCK MARKET REPORT
Editorial
"We're In Good Hands!"
Part 2
CNBC: If this organization was a person, more likely, his/her chosen vocation would have been prostitution...
Sunday 7-14-02, 1:15pm PST
Editorial By Ike Iossif/President/C.I.O. Aegean Capital Group, Inc.
(The following views reflect the beliefs of Mr. Iossif and are not necessarily the views of Aegean Capital Group, its principals, directors, employees, and/or other affiliated companies and individuals.)
I love to read, I have hundreds of books in several bookcases around the house, and in the office. However there are five books that are permanently on my desk-so I can reach them easily when I need them. On the left side of my desk, I have "Technical Analysis Of Stock Trends" by Edwards & Magee, along with "Options As A Strategic Investment" by Larry McMillan. On the right side of my desk, I have the Bible, "Plato: Complete Works" edited by J.M. Cooper & D.S. Hutchinson, and the Constitution of the United States of America.
Obviously, I consider all the above mentioned books of significant importance. However, for this editorial I would like to concentrate on the Constitution, and more specifically its guarantee of freedom of speech and of a free press. The Founding Fathers -in their infinite wisdom- saw a free press as an inalienable component of the democratic process. They saw the press as a watchdog, as the keeper of the truth. I think it is a safe assumption that the same principles also apply to the "financial press/media." I can not think of any organization that has betrayed more the vision of the Founding Fathers -with regards to the role of the press- than CNBC!
No other media outlet has so grossly collaborated with Wall Street scoundrels looking to sell their junk, no other media outlet has so enthusiastically promoted lies and biased opinions that have resulted in devastating losses for many naive investors who chose to believe the misinformation served to them by CNBC and its "guests"
I have heard numerous stories from colleagues who at one time or another were contacted by CNBC with regards to being a guest, never to be called again, when it turned out that their views did not conform to the official "party line." I would like to share my own.
Early October of 2001, I was contacted by Martha MacCallum, twice. Apparently, she was
a) aware of an article that I had written back in April of 2001, warning that the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East posed a significant threat to the U.S. financial markets because it would ultimately result in terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, and
b) she was responding to an email I had sent criticizing CNBC guests over their suggestions to the public to buy stocks for patriotic reasons. (See related articles: Weekly Report for 4-6-01 and "Patriotism Proves To Be A Poor Investment Guide" by Aaron Task, thestreet.com
She told me that she was interested in having me as a guest, and she wanted to know my opinion about the markets going forward. So, I told her briefly what I thought, and I added that I would set up a page within our site with my detailed views, and after she reviews it, then she can select whatever it is that we could cover in the interview. No specific time, or date was set. She was supposed to call me back after she read my detailed thoughts. Below is the page with those thoughts:
10-14-01, 7:05PM PST
Hi Martha, I hope the following charts shed some light to what is taking place.
1) The way markets behave, bears certain characteristics that constitute what I call the "signature" of the move. Price action, when seen in a vacuum, provides little information with regards to the true state of the market. However, by examining the "signature" of the move we can draw a much better, and accurate conclusion. I will not bore you with the details of what each one of the following indicators measures and how it does it. Just take a look at the "signature" of the rally, and the "signature" of previous bear market rallies, you will see where I am getting at.
The part in the red rectangle is the "signature" of the rally, as measured by 12 different technical indicators for different time frames. Notice the similarity between the current rally, and the one in April. (I've got another 9, altogether 18 indicators illustrating the same thing)
2) The following charts are telling an even more revealing story. The first one is NASDAQ, second is the NDX 100 A/D line, the third is the A/D line for the entire NASDAQ Composite, and the last one represents the collective momentum of all the 100 stocks in the NDX but the weight of the momentum for each component is equal to its capitalization weight in the NDX. (If you got confused just focus on the bottom line: it captures the distortions caused by higher capitalization stocks)
Take a good look at the difference between the A/D line for the Composite and the A/D line for the NASDAQ 100. These charts show unmistakably- that the current rally is centered among a handful of stocks in the NDX, and there has not been -at least up to now- broad participation. Second -and more worrisome- is what the Aggregate Momentum chart illustrates: the current advance is dominated by a handful of "momentum" stocks in the NDX that are popular by short-term traders. Obviously, if the rally continues, there is a good chance we may see some participation -like what we saw back in January, however, the points to keep in mind are the following:
2a. A characteristic of a bull market rally is its broadness, on the other hand, a characteristic of a bear market rally is its narrowness. For all the "hurrah" the rally has garnered, it is based on roughly 60-70 stocks in the NDX!
2b. Notice the "signature" of the aggregate momentum indicator, and its similarity to the rally in April.
2c. Rallies that are narrowly centered on speculative "momentum" sponsored by short-term traders, tend to end abruptly. Since the bear market started we have had 8 such rallies (see below) they have all resulted in lower prices down the road.
14-Apr-2000 to 01-May-2000: Up 19.1% in 11 days
23-May-2000 to 17-Jul-2000: Up 35.0% in 38 days
02-Aug-2000 to 01-Sep-2000: Up 15.7% in 23 days
12-Oct-2000 to 20-Oct-2000: Up 13.2% in 7 days
30-Nov-2000 to 11-Dec-2000: Up 16.0% in 8 days
02-Jan-2001 to 24-Jan-2001: Up 24.7% in 16 days
04-Apr-2001 to 22-May-2001: Up 41.1% in 34 days
18-Jun-2001 to 29-Jun-2001: Up 8.6% in 10 days
3) Last but not least, I must have heard at least 50-60 times last week, that the "market is at pre-attack levels" However, I have not heard, once what it really means. Let's take a look at the two charts below:
In the aftermath of the attack on the WTC, investors demanded and additional risk premium for U.S. equities in order to reflect the new realities currently present in our country, and their ramifications to the long term trends of economic growth. The fact that the markets are back to pre-attack levels, it means -according to the market- that no additional risk premium is necessary, because there is no in additional risk! However, just two days ago, the President and the FBI warned of additional attacks, your colleague Tom Brokaw was the intended target of a criminal act-which is probably unrelated to terrorism, but it shows the "unknown" factors lurking out there. In other words, the bottom line is this: there is plenty of risk around, yet the "market" sees no reason to demand an additional premium to compensate for the additional risk. That's silly! No serious, professional, risk-averse investor subscribes to such lunacy. People touting and celebrating the fact that the market is back to pre-attack levels, is akin to people saying in March of 2000, that "eyeballs" are more important than free cash flow!
Best Regards
Ike
--------------------------
As you can see, I clearly voiced the view that the rally of the September lows was nothing more but a bear market rally, and I backed up my conclusion with solid scientific research. However, the official "party line" at the time pushed by the Wall Street scoundrels who also happen to be CNBC's regular guests, was that "We are in a brand new bull market, and people ought to be buying stocks, if they do not want the train to leave without them!" CNBC"s own Larry Kudlow declared with much fanfare -and idiocy I may add- on Tuesday 10-16-01 at 4:15 PM PST
"...The market has discounted everything there is to be discounted, and then some, BUY IT!"
Thus, I was NEVER contacted back! My heretic views were not worthy of CNBC. The despicable organization was interested in helping its Wall Street advertisers unload stock to the public. So, I waited until after the market made new lows and I sent Martha the following e-mail:
----- Original Message -----
From: Ike Iossif
To: Maccallum, Martha (NBC, CNBC)
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 6:52 PM
Subject: I told you so....
Dear Martha,
When you first contacted me last year, and you asked me about the market, I set up a page within our website and I showed you most of our proprietary indicators that examine the "signature" of market move. If you recall they all showed that the "signature" of the rally off the September lows had the "signature" of a BEAR market rally. Also, I told you that within six months the unity displayed by politicians due to the events of 9-11, will vanish, and the blame game will start which will further erode foreigners' confidence. We can see that now with the calls for investigation, at one point Democrats even asked "what did the President know, and when?" I also told you that the dollar will sink, and will take with it the stock market. And last, I told that the "recovery" in the first quarter was going to be a "statistical" one, and in real terms the economy will slow down significantly in the second half. I displayed for you many charts supporting my opinion. My conclusions were not qualitative in nature, they were not just "thoughts" they were quantitatively based, and I had all the numbers and the charts to make the case. However, I never heard back from you! I am not the only professional in this business who had come to those conclusions. MOST people I know, even by using different methodology they had come to the same conclusions. However, what I find it particularly interesting, is the fact that over 90% of your guests have spent the last 9 months telling people how wonderful things were, and why they should buy stocks! Anyone who was unfortunate enough to listen to that advice, is now dead broke! I am sorry to say this, but CNBC with its biased coverage has inflicted as much pain on common people as the crooked analysts you talk about. I have the impression that you are an honest woman, so I would like to ask you this question: HOW DO YOU FEEL FACING THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WATCHING, KNOWING THAT CNBC HAS DONE NOTHING BUT PROMOTE LIES THAT HAVE COST PEOPLE THEIR LIFE SAVINGS?
CNBC is NOT interested in telling people the truth, is interested in selling advertising spots to Wall Street, and Wall Street wants people to buy stocks to their detriment. How can you stand for that?
Sincerely
Ike Iossif
President/ C.I.O
Aegean Capital Group, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think she returned my email? Of course NOT!
Why has CNBC been so biased towards the "bullish- all is well" thesis? For one reason and one reason only:
CNBC is not interested in being a watchdog, CNBC is not interested in living up to the vision of the press and its role as envisioned by the Founding Fathers. Ladies and Gentlemen, CNBC is interested in selling advertising spots to sponsors, and they cover the market as it suits the interests of those sponsors, not the public's. Let's take a look at CNBC's commercials. The following are the commercials run by CNBC on 5-30-01 and their sponsors. (We randomly selected that date, anyone who watches CNBC will agree that every day is the same!)
CNBC's commercials for Friday 5-30-01 from 6:45am to 10:45am PST
# Time Slot Company Type Of Business
1 6:56am Mercenary
2 Brown & Co. Brokerage
3 Island.com Brokerage
4 WSJ Financial Press
5 Tylenol Pharmaceutical
6 Select Quote Insurance
7 7:23am Brown & Co. Brokerage
8 Infiniti Auto
9 Barron's Financial Press
10 7:30am Nissan Auto
11 Just for Men Beauty
12 7:37am Conoco Oil
13 Schwab Brokerage
14 Fidelity Brokerage
15 7:44am BASF Conglomerate
16 Mylanta Pharmaceutical
17 Morgan Stanley Brokerage
18 Scott Trade Brokerage
19 CyberTrader Brokerage
20 7:51am Merril Lynch Brokerage
21 Select Quote Brokerage
22 7:59am CyberTrader Brokerage
23 8:13am IBD Financial Press
24 Scott Trade Brokerage
25 8:23am Bowflex Exercise
26 8:28am Prudential Brokerage
27 WSJ Financial Press
28 8:47am Schwab Brokerage
29 8:53am Ameritrade Brokerage
30 WSJ Financial Press
31 8:58 Infineon Semiconductors
32 Prudential Brokerage
33 Buffalo Niagara
34 9:12am CyberTrader Brokerage
35 Prudential Brokerage
36 9:21am Brown & Co. Brokerage
37 Nissan Auto
38 Barron's Financial Press
39 9:28am Miller Beverage
40 Sears Retail
41 9:39am CyberTrader Brokerage
42 Nissan Auto
43 9:45am Fidelity Brokerage
44 WSJ Financial Press
45 Scott Trade Brokerage
46 9:52am Nissan Auto
47 Quick & Reily Brokerage
48 9:59am Alliance Capital Brokerage
49 Select Quote Brokerage
50 10:11am MyDiscountBroker Brokerage
51 Island.com Brokerage
52 10:28am Boeing Aerospace
53 Payden Funds Brokerage
54 10:45am Brown & Co. Brokerage
FACTS ABOUT CNBC:
TOTAL NUMBER OF COMMERCIALS 54
COMMERCIALS FROM BROKERAGE COMPANIES 28 (51.85%)
If half of the program's advertising revenue comes from an industry that benefits from "Bull Markets" would the program offend its sponsors by giving voice to those who correctly identified for the last two years that the US equities markets had entered a "Bear" markets ? Do you think, CNBC viewers are getting "balanced" and "objective" coverage from CNBC? If you were CNBC would you broadcast the opinion of those who were urging investors to "sell" and stay on the sidelines (which would have deprived all these advertisers from the commissions they make when investors buy and sell stocks?)
Obviously, we all have a choice, none of us is forced to watch the garbage that is being served by this shameful and despicable "news" organization. Never-the-less, that should not prevent anyone from continuing to expose the disservice this organization has done, and shamelessly continues to do for the public.
In for journalism to protect the interests of the public- as the Founding Fathers envisioned- journalists must have decency, integrity, and a sense of duty, obviously you won't find these qualities possessed by your "friends" at CNBC, the same "friends" who made Henry Blodget a star!
You can read "We Are In Good Hands Part 1" simply by clicking on the link.
Ike Iossif
President/ C.I.O.
Aegean Capital Group, Inc.
Executive Producer
MarketViews.TV
TECHNICAL TOOLS YOU CAN USE! BY AEGEAN CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
All rights reserved 1995-2002
AUDIO CLIP BY : "ZAPATA" GEORGE
NEXT PAGE
(Pages 2 thru 14 are for subscribers only)
aegeancapital.com
Biography:
Mr. Ike Iossif is President and Chief Investment Officer for Aegean Capital Group, Inc., a European based investment research and asset management company. He has been in the business for 12 years and he has held various positions such as research analyst, equities/options trader, portfolio manager, and market strategist. He has been "Featured Advisor" in Timer Digest publication (July 16, 2001 edition) and he has been ranked among the "Top Ten" market timers by Timer Digest. For a complete biography and his methodology click HERE.
Services:
"The AegeanCapital Group Stock Market Reports" is a package that includes access to ALL the following :
Market Timing (Real Time)
Before The Bell
ChartReview Daily ( 7:00pm PST)
ChartReview Weekly
Newsletter
Editorials
All Tutorials
Best Of The Best
Intra-Day E-mail Commentary
Trade Of The Day Suggestions
Real Time Notification Of All Of Our Trades Via E-mail
Current Portfolio Holdings
To get more information, as well as, read all of our reports please visit: aegeancapital.com |
