THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (17579)	7/16/2002 8:57:04 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) of 21057

Yes or no? Assuming equivalent circumstances, yes. If I was a corporate insider, privy to confidential information, and I sold my shares immediately prior to a major negative disclosure, then I would accept that any thinking person would assume that I'd done something illegal and say so. I'd just be glad I didn't leave any hard evidence. I might be a bit piqued if it really had been just coincidence, but we both know that that sort of coincidence doesn't happen in the real world. there was no evidence to support it and in fact there was plenty of exculpatory evidence and facts No evidence to support it? What are you talking about? All the circumstantial evidence points directly at illegality. That deal has red flags flying all over it. The only exculpatory factor is the absence of either documentary evidence or personal testimony proving that the person making insider trade actually had the information in question.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next