RAMTRONIAN's Cache Inn Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : RAMTRONIAN's Cache Inn

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: NightOwl who wrote (8338)	7/17/2002 11:59:53 PM
From: Tom Caruthers	Read Replies (1) of 14464

NightOwl, That is some inspired writing. I almost want to go out and buy more. I think you are right about TXN. The number of patents they have pending suggest that their collaboration with RMTR is not as new as the licensing agreement would suggest. It's funny that someone on Yahoo mentioned the litigation pending between NSM and RMTR. I searched through NSM 10Q and 10K and nowhere can I find mention of RMTR or ferroelectrics. It's amazing that a company so far removed from ferroelectric research still can claim these patents as their own. RMTR is first to invent without dispute, but ownership of the patents is still undecided. I guess we'll have to wait to see what the Appeals court has to say. Tom C.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next