SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jcky who wrote (34593)7/18/2002 12:32:02 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
at which point in the liberation of Iraq will the United States be viewed as oppressors? Isn't the United States just setting up a new time line in the post-Saddam Iraq for ethnic and tribal clashes?

I think that many Americans find it difficult to comprehend how difficult it is to establish democracy in these situations. We tend to assume that once the structures are in place, you just have an election and it just takes off. Doesn't usually happen that way, though. A particular problem arises in situations where primary loyalty is owned not to the "nation" (often an abstract concept), but to a clan or regional/ethnic group. When this happens - as it so often does in post colonial situations - democratic structures simply don't work. Voting is not based on issues or parties as we know them, but on clan or ethnic lines. The winning parties use their positions not to build the nation but to advance the interests of their own group. Other groups become aggrieved, and seek redress in extralegal ways.

Of course there's no shortage of other things that can go wrong. It's a complicated process. At best, I would expect Iraq to be a weak, dependent client state for a long time. There are many worse scenarios.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext