THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (17801)	7/18/2002 5:34:25 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (2) of 21057

Fact: The SEC never talked to Bush Fact: The SEC (to my knowledge anyway) has never released the name of the party who bought Bush' stock Fact: Bush had access to inside information about the company when he made the sale Fact: Bush' father was President at the time (which by itself proves absolutely nothing, but at least raises the possibility that the SEC's decision not to pursue the matter might have been made for reasons other than the proper ones) Fact: Bush is attempting to publicly take the lead in bringing about higher ethical standards in corporate America I think Bush ought to start by taking the lead in encouraging complete openness about this old (and from all appearances very minor) matter. Just be open about it. That's all. Don't argue you were exonerated, or that it doesn't matter. We're not dumb. Just show us the facts, and let us decide. End of rant.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next