THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (17821)	7/18/2002 7:54:01 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (3) of 21057

I like that you said you "accept" the facts. It is really a matter of belief based on evidence. When did you become a believer? One doesn't "believe" "facts." Facts just are. You recognize their existence and you incorporate them in your thinking or you don't. You can not prove innocence In this kind of case, it would be hard. Typically it takes an alibi or proving an alternate theory of the crime. I can imagine scenarios that would be compelling for believing him innocent, though. It is really a matter of belief based on evidence. When did you become a believer? Earlier today I expressed such a belief with regards to the SEC Enforcement Division. And I told Bill that I understood how he could have such a belief in Bush's character. I, though, have no belief at all in any direction regarding what Bush did or didn't do. I simply don't have enough information to form such a belief. You can not prove innocence. Jewel, my only argument with Bill on this is his stubborn insistence that Bush has been declared innocent by the SEC. All he has to do is acknowledge that that isn't so and I'm off his case. You obviously know that it isn't so. Maybe you can explain it to him.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next