SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (17879)7/19/2002 1:30:10 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
Totally off base.

An investigation determines if there is probable cause to make an indictment. if the investigaiton turns up some evidence which would lead a prosecutor to determine a law was violated and he could get a conviction the proceeding moves into an adjudicatory phase.

There is nothing "up in the air" in this matter. There was NO evidence of any worngdoing. The market data did not support the charge. The investigation ended and the adjudicatory phase never began because there was no probable cause to move forward.

The man is innocent until proven guilty. In this case the case was so weak, the case never even moved beyond the investigation. The only people who see any "gray" in this matter are those who want to.

JLA
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News