Don't you guys learn to analyze texts and styles as part of your basic high school education???
(or just crossing off small boxes in multiple select exams??)
Use that and analyze this latest CDG response and the 3G white paper, although
from this indian potatoe (bless them) point of view both have similar traditional
backgrounds, but one of the a culturally defined type of "white paper".
(sometimes lacking so much pigment that they disappear)
Just waiting for a CDG "white paper".
Ilmarinen
Btw, just off the top of my memory, I especially enjoyed those little words of "if you are
increasing your bandwidth in 1.25MHz chunks", something like that.
As well as the obvious CDG-CDMA2000 focusing on old CDMA operators, must be a result
of some fear, not even trying to target GSM operators.
However, I well understood that list of all those frequencies of the basestations, as QCDMA and QuackDG
never really have paid attention to roaming handsets, and still struggle with both filters, Zif-Zifs and
guardbands
It would be really fun to mix 450MHz, 6W GSM numbers with 1.8GHz, 0,6W, even some 200km
boomer-GSM, masts with a free mountain provided, but there is a lot of young creative writers doing
that on more funny and important, even better than Oliver Twist and Beckett.
stuff. |
