Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 203.14

-0.8%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Win Smith who wrote (85645)	7/23/2002 8:29:07 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (1) of 275872

Win, kap -- is this the post on Intel thread you're looking for? Message 15953909 To:Dan3 who wrote (137482) From: dale_laroy Saturday, Jun 16, 2001 11:47 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to 137483 of 168666 >Other than Scumbria and, of course, Hans de Vries's terrific analysis at chip-architect.com, Intel had everybody fooled.< When? I remember it being disclosed back in Spring of 1999 that the IPC of the 1.4 GHz Willamette would be about the same as the 1.0 GHz PIII. Indeed, I exchanged email with Robert Coldwell, one of the designers of Willamette in which I tried to pin him down on the performance of Willamette. I wasn't very successful, but he left me with the distinct impression that P4 was not going to be a real barn burner. ------------------------ typo - Coldwell Petz

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next