SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (34935)7/24/2002 4:44:50 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
1. Is it wishful thinking to believe the U.S. is capable of carrying out a longterm plan to solve a longterm problem?

ME Oil isn't cheap, not if you add in all the "externalized" costs. The cost of the Gulf War ($100B+), for instance. 9/11/01 wouldn't have happened, if we hadn't had the Gulf War. Wind power is already cheaper than oil, if you include all the costs of oil in your cost-benefit analysis.

2. <<I doubt it's possible for the US to do this>> Israel has only one friend in the world, so they are totally dependant on the U.S. After the 1956 Sinai adventure, the U.S. imposed an oil embargo against Israel, until they gave back the Sinai. Why can't the U.S. take a "tough-love" approach again, and say to Israel, "give us a timeline for dismantling all settlements outside the frontiers you offered Arafat at the end of the Clinton administration. If not, we will start cutting government aid, and arms shipments, and we'll keep cutting them until we get that plan."?

4. Ethnic cleansing is a nasty phrase. It implies much more than an exchange of populations; it implies massacres, organized mass rapes, etc. Exchanges of populations is a solution that has been done many times, and it works. They were carried out extensively after WWII, in Europe and elsewhere, to permanently settle boundary disputes that had festered for centuries. 10s of millions of Germans, Hungarians, Poles, etc., were moved, so that the demographic boundaries corresponded to the political boundaries. There are very, very few examples of successful multi-ethnic states.

6. I agree, the current administration's protectionist (and UnEnvironmental) policies make it harder to win the War On Terrorism. The Bush team is confused, on this issue, and is confusing the rest of the world. We want cooperation on the things that are important to us (like the War), but we refuse to cooperate on issues the rest of the world cares about (global warming, access to U.S. markets, etc.)

<<Time is on our side.>> No, it isn't. We cannot stop the spread of knowledge about how to make and deliver weapons of mass destruction. As the world gets steadily more interconnected, systems vital to our lives are increasingly vulnerable to sabotage by the Disgruntled and LeftOut. Will "our culture" (whatever that is) win the war, before suicide bombers come to New York equiped with nukes? I'm afraid we are heading into an extended period of warfare, heavy restrictions on personal liberties, and ethnic hatred, before we "win the war". Cold War II, including McCarthyism, this time against the Muslims.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext