SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 223.44+4.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (85760)7/25/2002 1:32:22 AM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
Re: they are already talking about 4 GB barrier

It's really more of 2 to 3.5 gigabyte barrier. Windows reserves 1/2 the address space for the OS, limiting each application to 2 gig. You can get by that by running multiple instances or apps (well, some applications benefit from it, anyway), but you still lose about a 1/2 gig of physical addresses to devices - drivers for which were written with the assumption that there was plenty of address space available.

There's really not much of a point in getting more than 3 to 3.5 gig of RAM in an X86-32 machine. For most applications, 2 gig is all that will really be used.

Any machine that is expected to be useful for the next 4-5 years (which seems to be the new length of the upgrade cycle) should be a 64-bit machine.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext