SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.87-0.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (85882)7/26/2002 6:33:11 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Monica, Re: "If Intel continues to take market share from AMD, at 1% to 2% per quarter, Intel will need that extra capacity for CPU and chip set production."

Not likely. Market share that Intel steals from AMD is peanuts. Demand will eventually pick up as corporate spending increases, and that will be more significant than gains that Intel could get from AMD; however, it's still not likely to fill up all the "potential" fab space that Intel has.

By "potential", I mean all the fabs that Intel now uses, plus the fabs that they intend to build. If you add all that up, then overcapacity is what you get. That's why I think that Intel intends to decommision many of their current fabs in order to transition to more state-of-the-art facilities.

If you look at a recent article posted on this forum, you will see that Intel's most likely future is to decommision several .18u megafabs, and replace them with newer facilities, two of which are 300mm. Fab22 in Arizona is a 200mm .13u fab that will likely replace fab12, since it is located at the same spot. Fab11x is a 300mm .13u fab, and it will also likely replace fab11 in New Mexico. I also believe Fab24 (300mm and 90nm) will replace fabs 10 and 14 in Ireland.

This will give Intel more efficient and lower cost output. Of course, there are costs involved in decommisioning facilities like fabrication plants, but they may get enough revenue from salvaging some of their older equipment to balance things out.

What will be the most strategic aspect of this new construction is that they are most likely already planning for 90nm and 65nm manufacturing nodes with the design structure of their new facilities. This way, they avoid renovation costs when their older fabs aren't up for the newer specifications.

wbmw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext