Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stockman_scott who wrote (35051)	7/27/2002 3:13:17 AM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Funny, Mr. Ritter testified before Congress that Iraq retained the ability to build a bomb. By his own testimony, Iraq needs only the fissile material, and within days they could have a functional bomb. Critical elements of the Iraqi bomb program have never been recovered, which are known to exist because, as in one case, they were observed by IAEA inspectors being smuggled out the back gate while inspectors were held up at the front Saddam has publicly, on camera, exhorted his nuclear scientists to redouble their "efforts." It is apparent they are possibly attempting to revive their domestic centrifuge program. Either Mr. Ritter was falsifying his testimony before Congress and to US intelligence services, or "truthout" is misrepresenting Mr. Ritter. Iraq seeking steel tubing for uranium enrichment centrifuge: washtimes.com Saddam gives order reviving nuclear program 1998: nci.org Ritter testimony: nci.org existence of Iraqi implosion lenses: nci.org The ambiguity of the status of Iraq's nuclear program is good enough for me. Send in the Marines. Derek

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next