Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Fischofer who wrote (13075)	7/27/2002 9:05:36 PM
From: briskit	Read Replies (2) of 28931

If it were not pointless there would be no freedom and one cannot be free if there is an exogenous purpose to reality, for life is a process of creation, not discovery. I like what I think I got from your thoughts-gg. But this sentence is not clear to me. Are you saying that life is not discovery? What is the comparison between creation and discovery in relation to life? I am not sure that pointlessness and freedom are related in this way. You are saying that if there is a point then determinism naturally follows? It seems to me that if there is a god which does have some point in all this, we are obviously free to do what we want at the same time. Maybe you are taking the data and concluding then that there must be no point because everything that humans can imagine is believed, even lived out, and there are no apparent "ultimate" consequences?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next