SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (35139)7/28/2002 10:05:55 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
To the extent that the Gulf War was "left to the Generals" they went for an overkill

Yes, they did. It worked out rather well.

and Powell, as CJCS, is the one most responsible for not taking out Saddam.

He has no responsibility for that. None. It was a political decision, made by politicians. Given the information available at the time and the constraints that applied at that time, I'd still have to say it was probably the right decision to make.

You hire Generals to do "the invading and fighting". You hire politicians to make the judgement as to whom and when and where we fight.

You also hope that the politicians will talk to the generals before they make their decision, and listen to what they have to say. It pays as well to keep a damned close eye on the politicians, because these are not trustworthy people.

I trust the generals to do their job and do it well. I can't say the same for the politicians.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News