SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raymond Duray who wrote (2416)7/31/2002 12:37:31 AM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (2) of 3602
 
This is Coudert Bros. take, not exactly neutral*, but it will launch your research:

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley (Financial Services Modernization) Act:

Merchant Banking Activities

June 5, 2000

coudert.com

*for instance, the belief that forming a separate corporation protects fed insured funds is false. Technically these corps are as "separate" as the SPE's at Enron, and as a practical matter, if the sub needs the cash, the bank will feed itself rather than making a loan to a legitimate customer.

In effect, ability to repay, no longer becomes a test of lending. Money is diverted from worthy entraprenuers to the banks left pocket. There is no competition for the federally insured funds.

This is why Glass Stegall was enacted after the last depression. Credit dries up, money is diverted, the velocity of the money supply comes to a screeching halt.

The stock market is intended to be competition for the banks which prevents this. But when the Banks can neutralize the stock market, the first thing the banks do is grab all the money they can, and try to put anyone else in jail.

It has started. About two years ago. Right after the enactment of this bill.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext