Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dayuhan who wrote (35393)	7/31/2002 2:07:38 AM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Hi Steven Rogers; Re: "The big unpredictable factor in the Saudi equation, of course, is where the Saudi armed forces would line up. For some reason it is in my mind that the military leadership is largely in the pro-Western camp, but I don't remember why I think that, and I certainly won't proclaim it as likely to be true." Even if they're in the pro-western camp, they'll mostly still resist us at the borders. National sovereignty is important to the military mind. And orders are orders. Hell, to sink the French fleet the British had to first kill hundreds of Frenchmen in 1940 (operation Catapult). I think it would be rash in the extreme to expect that the Saudi military would assist the US in a take over of their oil resources. And as soon as you start killing Saudi military personnel, the response by the survivors will be to fight back. This is human nature. The only way the US could get into Saudi Arabia without their military fighting against us would be at the invitation of a subset of the Saudis that already had some sort of territory under their control. Sort of like Chiang Kai Shek, and probably with the same eventual result. -- Carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next