SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: aladin who wrote (35531)7/31/2002 5:13:22 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
I would say, offhand, that US/Iraq bears more similarity to Israel/Lebanon in '82 than to Israel in '67, at least in terms of relative threat and relative force of arms anyway.

The WMD argument is considerably more ambiguous than the "War Now!" people would have it. As I've alluded to earlier, if you want to worry about WMD, worry about Pakistan, where nukes are not the least little bit hypothetical.

As far as "wiping out all the Arabs", that's not all that distant from local "War Now!" sentiment. At least to the point where Saudi Arabia and Egypt are considered more or less equivalent on the "due for regime change" list to Iraq and Iran, regardless of how long we've found common interest with them, or that those governments are much more threatened by than allied with the Islamists. Jordan seems to be the only place that gets a pass, it being the one shining example of Hashemite restoration and all. Plus, Jordanian troops are massed at the Saudi border! Allegedly, the previous King Hussein there was a loyal CIA client to boot, by some accounts. On retainer for $1meg a year, supposedly.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext