SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 232.37-0.9%Dec 3 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Oeconomicus who wrote (144520)8/1/2002 2:44:04 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) of 164684
 
"it's value becomes simply the present value of the expected future intrinsic value, where that expected future IV is the mean of a range of possible future IVs and the discount rate used is adjusted for the risk reflected in the dispersion of that range of outcomes" Nope -- as in my house example, it is purely a matter of a volatility premium and a time premium. If the housing market is swinging wildly then the option is worth more. If the time to expiration is longer, it is worth more. And vesting is another red herring. They have value when granted. If companies decide not to use options as compensation because they are ineffective when properly reported -- so be it. But to perpetuate fraudulent reporting of earnings by not including options as compensation cannot be justifed for its presumed exoedience to the managers of the companies involved in this fraud. All the mumbo jumbo and smokescreens in the world don't change the facts -- options are compensation and compensation MUST be expensed to accurately reflect earnings.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext