SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Short A. Few who wrote (4303)8/6/2002 2:34:10 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) of 5185
 
" Pitt's reluctance to act has been true to form."

Well, Pitt and Ashcroft--I almost said Bushcroft--would act if Bush told them to do so.
Bush will let the corporate Enron crooks off the hook.

Enron's collapse and its manipulation of accounting tricks might never have happened
had it not been for deregulation. Former President Ronald Reagan supported deregulation
so he should be held accountable for the part his policies played in Enron's rise and fall.
(Bush's policies and corporate America have taken advantage of Reagan and Republican policy.)

"Enron was a prime beneficiary of the relaxed regulatory
climate of the 1990s.

Lay, an energy regulator in the 1970s, built the company to
take advantage of the deregulation of natural gas prices and
sales that began in the Reagan administration."


Excerpt from the article, "
THE FALL OF ENRON | Catastrophe
Hidden Debts, Deals Scuttle Last Chance "

By Peter Behr and April Witt
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, August 1, 2002; Page
A01

Page 1 on SI, see: Message 17840012

Page 2 on SI, see: Message 17840014
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext