SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Have you read your constitution today?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (209)8/7/2002 12:53:08 PM
From: epicure of 403
 
Idaho Supreme Court voids death sentence
August 7, 2002 Posted: 11:13 AM EDT (1513 GMT)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BOISE, Idaho (AP) -- Citing a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that "appears to invalidate the death penalty scheme in Idaho," the state's high court has thrown out a convicted killer's death sentence.

The Idaho Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday ordered the resentencing of Donald Fetterly. The five-paragraph decision set aside issues raised in challenging his conviction and execution until the new sentence is imposed.

"Whether those issues will remain following resentencing in this district court is problematic and speculative," the unanimous court said.

Fetterly, 49, sentenced to death for the 1983 stabbing death of Sterling Grammer. Tuesday's ruling made no reference to 21 other inmates on Idaho's death row, whose sentences are in various stages of appeal.

Prosecution and defense attorneys disagreed on the effect of Tuesday's decision, but both sides acknowledge it would take further rulings by the court to clarify the status of the state's death penalty law.

LEGAL RESOURCES

Latest Legal News


Law Library


FindLaw Consumer Center Select a topicBankruptcyDiscriminationDivorceEstate PlanningLandlord-TenantPersonal InjuryTaxes




In June, the U.S. Supreme Court held that in the sentencing phase of a capital crime a jury, not the judge, must decide whether the aggravating factors are sufficient to warrant execution.

Without explanation, the Idaho Supreme Court said that ruling "appears" to invalidate the state's death penalty legislation.

The attorney general's office has maintained that only a handful of Idaho's death row cases could be affected by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling -- Fetterly among them __ because the juries in finding guilt did not specifically find aggravating circumstances in the murders.

LaMont Anderson, spokesman for Idaho's attorney general, said the state may ask the Idaho court to reconsider the case.

Idaho has never given juries any say in the imposition of the sentence in capital cases.

Since Idaho reimposed the death penalty in 1976, only one person has been executed. State lawmakers have not yet discussed possible changes to bring the state death penalty law in line with the federal ruling.

Separately, in California, a Senate committee approved by 4-1 a bill Tuesday that would allow inmates to prove they are retarded to avoid the death penalty. The decision follows another U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the execution of mentally retarded inmates is unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court's ruling allows California and 19 other states that permit execution of the mentally retarded to legally define retardation. The generally accepted clinical definition is someone having an IQ of about 70 or lower.

Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext