Good stuff?
Equating Israel's racist Jewish regime with a democratic Europe borders on the twilight zone. If Gustave's theory were true, then the "fascist" Europeans would have blocked all Moslem immigration to Europe.
Islam's (with their Jewish allies) aggression against Christian Europe goes back to the seventh century. They invaded Christian territories of North Africa, Jerusalem, Asia Minor, Spain, France, Sicily, Jerusalem, (modern Turkey), the Balkans and Greece. All of these territories had been converted to Christianity by persuasion and not by force.
It was only after more than three centuries of aggression against these Christian communities that the besieged European Christian community began to fight back against the fanaticism of the Moslem-Jewish occupation. The Jews aided the Arab invasion in every campaign against Christian territories. When the Seljuk Turks converted to Islam, the campaign against Byzantium alarmed the Byzantine Emperor and he requested help from Urban II. In 1095 Urban gave his famous speech at Clermon Ferrand and called Western Christendom to take up arms and liberate the Holy Land. It was not a crusade for forced conversion but a crusade to defend besieged Christianity from centuries of external Moslem aggression and an internal Jewish alliance with the Moslems.
Spain was not liberated from the Moslem/Jewish occupation until 1492.
When you consider the violent and aggressive history of Islam, Gustav and his Moslem brothers should be happy that they are even allowed to live in civilized Christians nations. Christian Europe's historical memory has been attenuated by two centuries of Jewish/pagan propaganda.
The only reason Jews and Moslems break the doors down to immigrate into European/Christian nations is because they recognize the superior justice, morality and freedom that Christian societies in Europe and America provide.
Gustave's monotonous reference to all European nations as fascist states is simply self-serving socialist/Moslem propaganda.
The norm for Christian societies has been conversion through persuasion and justice and morality for all citizens.
In contrast, the norm in Moslem societies has always been coercion and brutality.
Why is it that Jews, Moslems and pagans always use the exceptions and abnormalities when criticizing two thousand years of Christian history? On the other hand, when they look at Moslem history, they avoid the norm of aggression, coercion, and brutality, and focus instead on the exceptional periods where a few benevolent Moslem leaders showed signs of justice and compassion to Christians?
Good stuff? I would say foolish, irrational, ahistorical and self-serving stuff! |
