SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KLP who wrote (36332)8/7/2002 2:50:57 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
I believe both sides are probably culpable for such a lack of an comprehensive energy plan. But Clinton/Gore's plan was rather dictatorial and focused on impractical electrical vehicles, whereas Bush seems to be more interested in hybrids and fuel cells which would require less of an infrastructual change to make the transition.

But I certainly believe that energy independence is a national security issue. And in particular, I'm all for developing hydrogen and fuel cells, and creating a network of nuclear power plants providing the necessary electricity to perform the electrolysis from water.

Clean, inexhaustible, and certainly feasible.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News