Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (36367)	8/7/2002 4:48:58 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) of 281500

John: IMO, our UNCONDITIONAL support for Israel could have devastating consequences...The U.S. has had trouble being 'even-handed' as it moves to try to bring about peace and stability in The Middle East...The NeoCons are clearly in favor of going to War in Iraq and it seems as if they are making the decisions in this Administration. Its most unfortunate that Bush does not appear to be more open-minded and seriously evaluate and act on input from folks like Colin Powell and Jordan's King Abdullah. It's very difficult for the NeoCons to back down. Here's an interesting NewsWeek article... msnbc.com <<...Last week Baghdad tried to avert a showdown. The Iraqi government offered to talk about letting U.N. arms inspectors back into the country—on certain conditions. Saddam loves to play that game. This time the hawks want the Security Council to say no, even if Saddam drops his conditions. What if the inspectors found no weapons of mass destruction? International sanctions would have to be lifted. Saddam would be free to stay in power as if nothing had ever happened. Intolerable...>>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next