Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 73.99

+3.1%

Nov 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kvkkc1 who wrote (60847)	8/7/2002 8:36:04 PM
From: OWN STOCK	Read Replies (1) of 77398

kvkkc: The service providers can obviously do their job in a profitable way: they choose not to. Why? Unfair competition: they like it. As long as RBOCs have local service to lean on, they are fine. Ever wonder why wireless is so cheap: one word, competition. $19.95 for local and long distance (some competition in the market), versus a DSL line at $49 (non-competitive market). No wireless towers in the 'hood forcing you to use wired service. Should tell you how the game is played. It should also tell you how to play the forward game: force or at least stimulate local competition. Good news is it looks like things are moving in that direction: wireless (public 802.11), versus coax. I sense some moves coming. JMHO -Own PS: IMO, CSCO is doing reasonably well, and except for the political mess that telecom is in, would be doing very well.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next