SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Aqua Dyne Inc
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: water-world-man who wrote (9)8/8/2002 7:54:50 PM
From: ms.smartest.person  Read Replies (2) of 18
 
That said, I believe this LOI is for real.

Do you have some info that was not in the PR or filed documents?

There is virtually nothing to go on out there. I have emailed a contact at the Las Vegas newspaper and he is checking. dodge.hoovers.telebase.com

This has the odor of a reverse merger. I am very suspiscious when an extensive search turns up nothing but the company filings and press releases - not even an article or mention of JetWater in trade publications.

IMO if the JetWater System was as good as they claim, why wouldn't it take off when R&D was being done in a state and, more particularly a city that has no water. Well, they have some - maybe more than Colorado, but that's nothing to write home about. LOL

IMO The PPS is huge when they do not have a working prototype - unless I read the published info wrong. I believe that Sand & whatever company signed the LOI based on the Centre testing. And who the heck is that Sand & whatever - can't find anything on them in Aust, but hope my contact can. Who's gonna build it? And used jet engines ... I would think those are not as easy to buy today - after 9/11 BWDIK.

Not impressed with the testing Centre - sent a note off to a physicist friend in Australia. Centre is under the Mining, etc. in Queensland and is a quasi-public/private Centre. All that said was it was tested, but I have not seen any published reports that included detailed data from the Centre.

Have you seen a patent #? All I saw was patent application had been filed in Australia, but was done as a multiple-country(20?) application. I have not searched the US Patent Office yet - leaving that to when I have time (or a grunt to do it for me).

Again ... on the websitethere is no email address, not even any mention of IR - not unusual for an OTC - just frustrating.

Merry
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News