Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (149290)	8/8/2002 8:20:09 PM
From: brian1501	Read Replies (1) of 1579773

Well, Bush Sr. didn't have nice hair and probably can't or won't get it up. Yet, he didn't take Saddam out. Why do you refuse to answer my question? Why is Clinton at fault but Bush Sr. is blameless? I guess I see them as apples and oranges. Bush Sr had the task of defending Kuwait, and we accomplished that. It would have been a great time to get rid of Hussein, but an objective above and beyond the original (successful) mission. And one that the left would have wussed out of anyways. Once the cease-fire was in place, defying the terms was a slap in the face of the US. Certainly not on the same level as a direct attack ala 9/11, but very different (worse) than a threat to one of our allies. Hussein picked a fight with one of Uncle Sam's friends, and Sam beat him up. Then later Hussein shoved Uncle Sam himself into a wall and Sam wimpered in the corner. That's the difference in my opinion. Maybe Hussein is a pretty good judge of character and resolve after all? Brian

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next